How does God’s love abide in anyone who
has the world’s goods and sees a brother or sister in need and yet refuses to help?
Little children, let us love, not in word or speech, but in truth and
action. – I
John 3:17-18
If a brother or sister is naked and
lacks daily food, and one of you says to them, “Go in peace; keep warm and eat
your fill,” and yet you do not supply their bodily needs, what is the good of that? So faith by itself, if it has no works, is
dead. – James 2:15-17
All who believed were together and had
all things in common; they would sell their possessions and goods and
distribute the proceeds to all, as any
had need. – Acts 2:44-45
Perhaps the
most important mark of Christian discipleship is what we do with our economic
resources. For the early church,
following the way of Jesus was intimately related to responding compassionately
and generously to people in need. From
the Torah and the Hebrew prophets, through Jesus’ teaching and practice, and
into the writings of the early Church, there is a clear pattern linking
biblical faith to economic justice.
Thus, there is
nothing new about the emphasis the new
monastic movement places on “Sharing economic resources with fellow
community members and the needy among us” as a vital mark of mission. This practice is as old as biblical faith
itself. What sets the new monastics
apart is their recovery of this emphasis as a communal, rather than an
individual, practice.
For the early
church, generosity was a mark of the community as a whole, in which possessions
and goods were shared and distributed according to the need (not the worth or
productivity) of the recipients. It was
only later, as the church became more institutionalized, that generosity became
a more individual action.
The Church
transitioned from being a model of egalitarian community that practiced social
and economic justice, to being an agency of charity for the wealthy to give to
the needy without transforming the basic underlying social relationships. There were exceptions to this trend, such as
the monastic orders and the Anabaptist wing of the Protestant Reformation, but
these were minority witnesses.
The new
monastics invite sharing resources with one another in ways that are creative
of community: not as acts of individual charity, but as ways to nurture the
common good. The form of sharing is less
important than the act of sharing itself: fostering gratitude, generosity, simplicity,
sustainability, community and justice. The
new monastic communities have evolved certain principles for sharing economic
resources as guidelines.
1) Shift from
“Ownership” to “Stewardship” – everything belongs to God and is entrusted to us
for a time for the sake of the common good.
How then do we share more fully what we have and need? Some examples include creating community
gardens, sharing tools (does everyone really need their own lawn mower?), car
sharing services, and exchanging childcare.
Think about it for a moment: we already pool resources to share a
priest. How else might we expand upon
that model?
2) Shift from
“Brokerage” to “Mutuality” – too often the Church can become a place for rich
people to drop stuff off for poor people to pick-up, without any real
interaction, much less mutual vulnerability.
St. Martin de Porres’
Hospitality House (which is itself a new monastic community) is a good example
of moving beyond brokerage; as are microloan programs like Mothers Helping Mothers, though at more of a
distance. St. Gregory’s Food Pantry, in which
recipients also volunteer to operate the pantry, is another example of finding
ways to move beyond “us” helping “them” to all of us sharing in our need and
our gifts.
3) Shift from
“Accumulation” to “Redistribution” - Shane Claiborne notes that redistribution of wealth is
not a prescription for society that must be mandated; it is a description
of society when people discover what it means to love. It is as simple is clearing out the closets
once per year and donating what you don’t wear anymore. It is as complex as finding ways to make
health care available to everyone. The
practice flows from the recognition of what is “enough,” and what is “excess”
to be shared with those who do not have enough.
The
practice of sharing in this way is not a moralistic burden, but rather an
opportunity to discover joy and freedom in our common life. It moves us from isolation to connection. It makes life possible and love
tangible. It is an invitation to follow
Jesus and discover Christ in one another.
No comments:
Post a Comment